17:30:58 #startmeeting 17:30:58 Meeting started Mon Oct 16 17:30:58 2017 UTC. The chair is whippythellama. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:58 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:31:06 #chair qqx mhrivnak raub 17:31:06 Current chairs: mhrivnak qqx raub whippythellama 17:31:14 #topic Check for Agenda Additions 17:31:20 None here. 17:31:25 Nothing from me. 17:31:31 coolio 17:31:36 raub: you around? 17:31:54 i'll take that as a "none here" :) 17:32:03 #topic October Meeting Recap 17:32:12 i thought it went reasonably well 17:32:14 I counted 49 people plus the speaker. 17:32:23 Agreed. It was a good crowd and a good size. 17:32:24 i was just about to say the same :) 17:32:39 And the recording came out well! 17:32:39 My count was about the same as well. 17:32:46 i thought so, too! 17:33:05 i had to trim it down just a touch - he recorded the announcements as well 17:33:16 cool. 17:33:17 but i'm pleased with the outcome 17:33:28 and he's willing to keep doing it, which is great 17:33:36 Pizza was late again unfortunately. 17:33:37 at least for the time being 17:33:38 We got $49 total contributed in the bucket. 17:33:50 Oh yeah, I haven't called Marco's yet to ask them WTF. 17:33:51 did rh sponsor at the old level? 17:34:00 Yep, we got $300 from red hat. 17:34:00 ie - $300? 17:34:03 nice 17:34:11 And I suspect that the pizza first coming after the announcements where we mentioned that there was a sponsor may have contributed to the low donations. 17:34:24 and yeah, marco's got some splainin to do 17:34:30 qqx: i agree 17:34:53 Do you want the picts I took from the meeting? 17:35:00 They did say that they had a driver cancel last-minute and ended up with just 1 person doing all deliveries. 17:35:14 raub: sure - you can post them up on the meetup page if you like 17:35:24 Will do 17:35:26 mhrivnak: aah, gotcha 17:35:26 Yeah, I posted one to the meetup page during the meeting. 17:35:41 i thought the speaker and topic were great 17:35:51 But still, Marco's should have called me to let me know the stuff would be late. 17:35:57 Agreed 17:36:28 yep 17:36:38 We definitely need signs up much earlier. 17:36:47 agreed - that's on me 17:36:49 Lots of people were still confused (including me). 17:37:08 Give me some signs since I tend to get in early 17:37:10 I arrived about 6:20 and there were already a dozen people waiting around. 17:37:22 gotcha 17:37:37 mhrivnak: Yep. I saw you passing while I was sitting 17:37:38 We should also describe how to get to the building on the website and on the meetup page. 17:37:44 raub: i can give you the signs i have if you like, but i can't give you the easel i had the big one on; that's my daughter's 17:37:50 mhrivnak: agreed 17:38:04 If you give me a file I can print it 17:38:09 Even just a piece of paper taped to the entrance that's on the road, that GPS takes most people to, would help a lot. 17:38:12 And then duct tape will help me out 17:38:21 i updated the map to put the 'meeting' marker right on top of the building, but i neglected to call that out in the announcements 17:38:22 Which I have a roll of 17:38:42 I will also take pictures of the path to get to the building 17:38:42 New signs should really be printed anyway. 17:38:55 The ones we had listed the old engineering building location. 17:39:00 raub: i'll see if i can find a file for it - i rolled these on my own a couple of years ago, and i'm really not sure where the original files are 17:39:01 qqx: In clay tablets? 17:39:06 but i'll see if i can track them down 17:39:21 qqx: yeah, that confused me 17:39:27 i had new ones made up 17:39:30 we used them last month 17:39:36 now i'm wondering if we got them back 17:39:52 i'm going to check through the bag and box to see if i just misplaced them 17:40:01 I can even get vinyl ones made BTW 17:40:03 i had thought they were in that folder, but i didn't look at them carefully 17:40:32 raub: depends on cost, but that would be nice 17:40:53 did anyone happen to broach the subject of holding a hack night with our speaker? 17:41:02 I did not. 17:41:20 ok 17:41:24 yeah, i forgot as well 17:41:53 since we didn't poll for interest anyway, i'd say we aren't having one this month 17:42:03 Agreed. 17:42:15 ok, i'll let caktus know 17:42:17 I'll be out of town the rest of this week, so I wouldn't be able to help facilitate. 17:42:37 #action whippythellama ping Caktus and let them know we won't be there this month 17:43:17 anything else on this month's meeting? 17:43:22 nothing here. 17:43:32 nope 17:43:47 nope 17:43:49 ok, cool 17:43:54 #topic General Business 17:44:03 mhrivnak: have you had a chance to get by the po box? 17:45:02 I did. 17:45:08 It was mostly junk mail. 17:45:20 thank you for going :) 17:45:22 And a couple of letters from Amazon Smile trying to get us to setup an account. 17:45:29 lol... no kidding :) 17:45:40 anything significant? 17:45:45 or important? 17:46:01 Where's the po box anyway? 17:46:02 Not even close. :) 17:46:10 Sounnds like my mail 17:46:11 heh heh 17:46:16 raub: it's down near ncsu 17:46:25 you can look up the post office by our zip code. 17:46:33 i think the address is on the steering site 17:46:34 It's on Lake Dam Rd just south of I-40. 17:46:47 address is even on our main website. 17:46:54 on the front page. 17:47:41 so, on the holiday party 17:48:06 Location? 17:48:12 we started to talk about it on thursday - are we all agreed that a potluck type setup would be best? 17:48:18 Yep 17:48:23 Man, it feels like the last one was just a couple of months ago... 17:48:30 tell me about it :) 17:48:35 Yes. 17:48:40 mhrivnak: it was... ;) 17:48:58 as for location, we've done pretty well at the rh annex, but i'm open to alternatives 17:49:19 the price and central location are very compelling at the annex 17:49:29 I'm happy to request the annex again, but I'm also happy with somewhere else. 17:49:30 (price being $0) :) 17:49:33 heh. 17:50:41 Well, how about I'll request it, and we'll see if it's available? 17:50:42 we don't have to choose right now, but it would be good to settle on the place in the next couple of weeks if possible 17:50:49 sounds like a good start :) 17:51:10 and I'll give the annual reminder that it's helpful to not use the word "party". :) 17:51:17 It's a holiday demo and social. ;) 17:51:19 lol 17:51:23 right, right 17:51:26 why was that, again? 17:51:33 did someone have an issue with "party"? 17:51:46 Someone who was not invited... 17:51:51 I haven't heard any complaints. 17:52:24 But if we go to Red Hat or any other venue and tell them "We'd like to host a party", that sounds like a different atmosphere and type of event than a "demo and social". 17:52:42 aaah, ok, yeah, i thought it was something like that 17:52:56 ok, let's press on 17:53:08 #topic Sponsorship/Finances 17:53:29 raub: looks like the tee shirts are getting there :) 17:53:46 thank you for driving that 17:53:50 I need to order mine today 17:53:52 Sure thing 17:54:07 +1 17:54:12 I ordered one over the weekend. 17:54:15 mhrivnak: were your 'non-male sizes/types' concerns addressed? 17:54:19 yep. 17:54:21 cool 17:54:26 BTW, we should make a point to remind people to contribute 17:54:27 yeah, i need to put in my order as well 17:54:32 It seems to just be a bad UX on Amazon's part. 17:55:03 raub: agreed in general, but was there a specific context you're speaking of? 17:55:11 mhrivnak: ah, gotcha 17:55:28 Beofre the main presentation 17:55:41 and in the email announcements 17:55:53 we do in the presentation 17:56:21 in the email announcements doesn't do a lot of good - too far removed from when they actually drop the money in the bucket ;) 17:56:47 but when we're announcing stuff like the tee shirts and smile, it can't hurt to bring it up 17:57:20 Yep 17:57:30 since we have a quorum here, we were talking about sponsorship levels 17:57:41 Can we get some xmas penguin run? 17:57:41 i don't recall us making it official, but i could be wrong 17:57:55 you know I am all up for it 17:58:04 did we want to go with the "$100 per 5 minutes" approach we tossed about? 17:58:11 yep 17:58:17 so $300 gets you 15 mins at the beginning of the meeting, etc 17:58:36 raub: yeah, i know you're all for it :) 17:58:45 mhrivnak, qqx - your votes? 17:58:47 I don't think anyone has ever used more than 5 minutes. 17:58:53 ok 17:59:04 So I'd say $100 == you get to introduce yourself and invite people to talk after the meeting. 17:59:19 I think it's worth doing, at least to try it out. 17:59:38 Can the $300 people get a penguin or something? 17:59:38 Yeah. I'm not opposed to trying anything. 17:59:43 To diff the levels 17:59:52 yeah, that's my thought too, raub 18:00:03 we need some reason for someone to sponsor at >$100 18:00:04 I think most of the sponsors don't want a penguin or other stuff. 18:00:14 They want access to talent. :) 18:00:26 Or they want talent to start using their product. 18:00:35 qqx: if you need to drop, thanks for coming :) 18:00:47 mhrivnak: agreed 18:00:52 mhrivnak: there has to be something they get they wouldn't at $100 18:01:19 I suspect that there will be at least a little bit before things actually start on this call. 18:01:23 I'd say $100 gets you an introduction at the start of the meeting. $300 lets you give an extended pitch. 18:02:04 Let's talk more about the levels in *the mailing list* since we are short on time 18:02:04 $100 == "supporter" and $300 == "sponsor" perhaps? 18:02:49 how about $100 == a slide and thank you in the announcements, $200 == that, plus you can give a quick introduction and pitch, $300 == all that, plus an extended pitch 18:02:55 ...and agreed, raub :) 18:03:10 +1 18:03:21 ok, any last minute things to add before we take it to email? 18:04:02 none here. 18:04:11 I am good 18:04:14 ok, cool 18:04:25 thanks, everyone! 18:04:31 oh, one thing i meant to do... 18:04:43 #action whippythellama ping Brian Jinwright re: November summary/bio 18:04:50 ok, now we're done :) 18:04:54 #endmeeting