17:42:42 <raub> #startmeeting 17:42:42 <Tribot> Meeting started Mon Aug 6 17:42:42 2018 UTC. The chair is raub. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:42:42 <Tribot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 17:43:00 <bdmc> OK. My question number one. Same order as last month, or from the month before? 17:43:27 <bdmc> I think that the numbers were 13 and 16. 17:43:41 <raub> Based on meetup I would say 13 17:43:55 <bdmc> Thank you. 17:44:04 <raub> #chair qqx bdmc raub 17:44:04 <Tribot> Current chairs: bdmc qqx raub 17:44:18 <raub> #topic Check for Agenda Additions 17:44:20 <raub> done 17:44:25 <bdmc> Did you notice that I added links in the "history" to last year's and this year's steering logs? 17:44:28 <raub> #topic Current Topics 17:44:50 <bdmc> "Meeting logs." 17:45:02 <raub> Nice. Will have to check it 17:45:16 <raub> So, are we recording this week's meeting? 17:45:34 <bdmc> #action bdmc order 13 pizzas for Thursday night. 17:45:55 <qqx> The announcement message said that it's not being recorded. 17:45:56 <bdmc> #action bdmc pizza order same as last month 17:46:29 <qqx> But, I guess there's a chance that that was carried over from last month. 17:46:42 <raub> qqx: I think that was the case 17:47:04 <bdmc> Is that a meeting-by-meeting thing, or was last month just an anomoly? 17:47:14 <raub> bdmc: anomaly 17:47:37 <bdmc> Thanks ( didn't have my dictionary up ) 17:47:43 <raub> BTW, I emailed Drew on the list and he did not seem to know 17:48:09 <raub> bdmc: I think by default we should record 17:48:42 <raub> I will find the email for our vidoegrapher and see if he will be able to attend 17:48:48 <qqx> It's mainly been if we have someone to do the recording. 17:49:09 <bdmc> I agree. It's a volunteer thing, though, isn't it? 17:49:19 <qqx> Yes. 17:49:25 <raub> Exactly. 17:49:39 <raub> Which we should ask him if he will be able to do it 17:49:41 <qqx> Eek, looking closer at the announcement mail I'm seeing a bunch of mojibake. 17:50:16 <bdmc> Is oops the word? 17:50:40 <raub> Well we will be sending out another announcement today anyway 17:50:45 <raub> We can correct that 17:51:08 <raub> So, what else do we need to do for this meeting? 17:51:28 <bdmc> That's probably the critical things. 17:52:07 <raub> Also, isn't ATO going to be there to give a quick talk or something? 17:52:14 <raub> Or am I imagining things? 17:52:38 <bdmc> No. As far as I know ATO is "sponsoring" ( unofficially ) this meeting. 17:53:09 <raub> I do hope they spend at least 5 minutes to talk 17:53:19 <bdmc> From the conversation, the two of them are a package. 17:53:29 <raub> That'll work for me 17:53:40 <raub> #topic Future Topics 17:54:10 <bdmc> Was Zenoss intended to be September? Who is driving that? 17:54:18 <raub> So, Drupal should be on 10/11, right? 17:54:27 <bdmc> Yes 17:54:39 <bdmc> 10, 11, 12, whatever. 17:54:53 <raub> I am confused myself, bdmc. I will reach out to them if nobody else was doing it 17:55:05 <raub> Yeah, I meant drupal for oct 17:55:33 <raub> At https://steering.trilug.org/wiki/index.php/UpcomingMeetings it shows zenoss on oct, so I guess we need to do some cleaning 17:55:38 <raub> Then we need something for Nov 17:55:40 <bdmc> Exactly. Chris said that he was better in October than September, so we agreed on that. 17:55:45 <raub> and start thinking on Dec 17:55:53 <raub> bdmc: Gotcha 17:56:07 <raub> #action raub reach out to zenoss about talking on Sept 17:56:14 <bdmc> December is the Christmas party, isn't it? 17:56:17 <raub> Yep 17:56:28 <raub> So we need to plan what we want to do 17:56:29 <bdmc> So, no speaker, just a venue. 17:56:36 <raub> and then start lining up for next year 17:56:52 <bdmc> Do we want to do a "science fair" again? 17:57:02 <bdmc> In December 17:57:12 <raub> I am open for suggestions 17:57:30 <bdmc> qqx: preferences? 17:57:41 <raub> Who wants to talk to Michael North and see if he is up for Talking on Nov? 17:57:53 <bdmc> Who is Michael North? 17:58:41 <raub> From the agenda, "Michael North, Machine Learning" 17:58:50 <raub> (north@digitalphenomena.com) 17:59:20 <bdmc> Do any of us three know him? 17:59:39 <qqx> I don't. 17:59:50 <raub> He was the one who was going to talk on June or July and then disappeared for months, so I panicked and got Disney to talk 17:59:59 <qqx> IIRC, he'd mailed awhile ago volunteering to speak. 18:00:08 <raub> There are some emails from him on the steering list 18:00:20 <raub> I think he even submitted abstract already 18:00:32 <bdmc> raub: So you have had conversations with him? Perhaps you should continue. 18:00:59 <bdmc> November or September? 18:01:01 <raub> I did not. And think I am not in his good list 18:01:11 <bdmc> OK, then I can reach out. 18:01:16 <bdmc> Month? 18:01:24 <raub> Brian Gerard was who was talking to him first 18:01:34 <bdmc> So a Brian can continue. 18:01:37 <qqx> He did send an abstract and bio, I believe that was shortly after we got the alternate talk scheduled. 18:01:58 <raub> I don't care. Pick one and then I talk to zenoss about taking the other 18:02:03 <bdmc> Next month, then? 18:02:07 <raub> Sure 18:02:17 <bdmc> OK. I will write him after this. 18:02:18 <raub> Just have it committed so we can move on 18:02:29 <qqx> https://www.trilug.org/mailman/private/steering/2018-July/021859.html 18:02:41 <bdmc> #action bdmc contact Michael North about speaking in September. 18:03:23 <bdmc> #action bdmc report to steering list about September speaker confirmation 18:03:28 <raub> bdmc: I think there was also some event that was going to take place at triembed this month 18:03:37 <bdmc> ??? 18:03:46 <raub> I think you reached out to the guy but nothing came out of that 18:04:13 <bdmc> Sorry. What I meant was, what does TriEmbed have to do with September? 18:04:21 <raub> August 18:04:35 <bdmc> Our speaker in September. 18:04:41 <qqx> raub: Are you referring the the InstallFest that Scott Hall had been discussing? 18:04:47 <raub> Yep 18:04:53 <raub> qqx: thanks 18:05:01 <qqx> I don't think that was actually related to TriEmbed. 18:05:02 <bdmc> Ohhhh. No answer from Scott, yet. 18:05:21 <bdmc> That was Splat Space. 18:05:24 <raub> I can try to email him too just for the hell of it 18:05:31 <raub> I get them confused ;) 18:05:40 <bdmc> Go ahead. 18:05:56 * raub wait for the massed with torches and pitchforks 18:06:15 <raub> #action raub reach out to Scott Hall about InstallFest 18:07:07 <raub> Anything else pressing? 18:07:35 <bdmc> If we have speakers ( very tentative ) up to the end of the year, I would say that we are progressing. 18:07:47 <raub> I agree 18:08:09 <bdmc> Still have that money problem, but that isn't necessarily this meeting. 18:08:17 <raub> Who wants to talk to Thomas V. Thomas about recording? 18:08:26 <bdmc> I thought that you volunteered. 18:08:41 <raub> Right you are! Did I actioned that already? 18:08:48 <bdmc> Didn't see it. 18:09:07 <raub> #Action Contact Thomas V. Thomas to see if he will be able to record this meeting 18:09:32 <qqx> I sent this to the list, but I'll action it here as well. 18:09:42 <raub> i saw that 18:09:42 <qqx> #action qqx Send next round of announcement messages. 18:09:46 <bdmc> Hmmm. I wonder whether capital "Action" works. 18:10:02 <qqx> There's also the issue of not having the nick included. 18:10:06 <raub> Which leads to: who will send today's announcement? 18:10:21 <raub> qqx: Ok, I can do it again 18:10:34 <raub> #action raub Contact Thomas V. Thomas to see if he will be able to record this meeting 18:10:56 <raub> This time in lowercase, bdmc. We can then see how each one looks like in the log 18:11:01 <bdmc> We still have that permission error on Announcements. 18:11:12 <raub> Lovely 18:11:12 <qqx> We might want to wait a bit on the next announcements, to get the recording situation updated. 18:11:22 <raub> Sure 18:11:31 <qqx> What permission error on announcements? 18:12:16 <raub> I have a meeting to attend 18:12:16 <bdmc> Whenever Lauren, and perhaps Mauricio, sends out the announcement, we see a message to steering, saying that this is not a valid person to send mail. 18:12:25 <raub> can anyone end the meeting? 18:12:32 <raub> (after you are done) 18:12:38 <qqx> I don't recall seeing that. 18:12:40 <bdmc> And it needs to be approved. 18:12:51 <bdmc> raub: go ahead 18:12:54 <bdmc> close 18:13:29 <bdmc> qqx: if you have a couple of minutes, let me get one of those messages. 18:13:40 <qqx> The announcement messages have always required approval. 18:14:10 <bdmc> So it doesn't matter who does it? They all are "moderated?" 18:14:16 <qqx> Yes 18:14:35 <bdmc> OK. I thought that it had to do with the new people. 18:14:55 <bdmc> It seems that Mauricio has actually left, so shall we end? 18:15:05 <qqx> ok 18:15:11 <qqx> #endmeeting