16:31:03 #startmeeting 16:31:03 Meeting started Wed Oct 1 16:31:03 2014 UTC. The chair is IsharaComix. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:31:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 16:31:17 #chairs billf mhrivnak jackhill whippythellama 16:31:34 #topic Meeting Next Week (logistics) 16:31:46 All right, all! 8 days until the next meeting. 16:31:53 Anyone know in advance they won't be there? 16:32:07 afaik, i'll be there 16:32:15 I'm currently waiting on my room reservation, I should hear back tomorrow. 16:32:20 I will be there. 16:32:29 I'll be there too 16:32:38 are we trying for the same room as last time? 16:32:40 looks like all four of us! 16:32:56 whippythellama: sorry, looks like back to eb2 - my contacts can't get me rooms in eb1. 16:33:09 no worries 16:33:11 but we've got eb1 in november. 16:33:23 so back and forth nonsense is incoming. :) 16:33:41 the rooms in eb2 are bigger, but the pizza setup in eb1 is better :) 16:34:04 Do we want to delegate roles for this meeting? As always, I'm happy to run cleanup and new member greeting. 16:34:25 i'll do drinks again 16:34:28 thanks! 16:34:40 I'll do pizza as usual. 16:34:44 Thanks thanks! 16:34:49 i can also emcee again 16:35:09 I think Jack said something about wanting to emcee this time, but we can ask him 16:35:17 sure, np 16:35:37 If you do decide to emcee, we just have to give you time to make your own slides. 16:35:52 yep 16:36:03 given we have 8 days, that shouldn't be much of a stretch ;) 16:36:12 Are we going to sell/raffle off the equipment this month? 16:36:24 I would be nice if we could colaboratively edit the slides 16:36:36 agreed, billf 16:36:41 the equipment was a topic I brought up 16:36:52 billf: want to take it away here? 16:36:56 it's just harder to emcee when you're seeing them for the first time when you get up to the podium ;) 16:37:13 should we raffel or sell it ? 16:37:28 or give it to who has the most need ? 16:37:40 i don't like having to make a value judgment 16:37:52 I think we've had this discussion before and decided to send out a list with prices and see what happens. 16:37:54 I am also open to asking the mailing list what to do with it 16:37:59 billf++ 16:38:05 Maybe include that in the meeting anno? 16:38:06 We could also just take offers. 16:38:26 Maybe a separate email is better. 16:38:33 * jackhill waves 16:38:38 jack's here! 16:38:40 sep email 16:39:10 make it a fundraising gimmick, perhaps - support trilug and get some spare hardware in the process, that sort of thing 16:39:17 whippythellama++ 16:40:29 * mhrivnak needs to leave this meeting a few minutes before 1 to get on a customer call. 16:40:47 mhrivnak - would that alleviate your previously mentioned concerns about giving away hardware as an organization? 16:41:35 I think we should attempt to get reasonable compensation for those assets. 16:41:42 There are a lot of ways to do that. 16:41:51 Well, I say we put out an offer and see who bites 16:42:11 "bidding starts at $(reasonable compensation)" 16:42:15 :) 16:42:29 All right. Let's move on in the agenda and we can get back to this if there's time. 16:42:41 #topic Reminder for next meeting 16:42:57 Since everyone else is doing things, I can send the reminder. 16:43:11 Cool. We just need to get RH added as the sponsor. 16:43:22 Do you have their desired blurb? 16:43:42 I can find one. 16:43:58 once i get that, i can send it out 16:44:05 sponsor and room number 16:44:21 if the room number is not available, just it will be announced next week 16:44:37 Good point. If I don't hear back, I'll just say it's in EB2, though. 16:45:03 #topic IRC incident 16:45:11 jackhill: you here? want to debrief? 16:46:26 you didn't miss anything, IsharaComix 16:47:21 if jackhill stepped away, was anyone else aware of the issue who could provide info? 16:47:51 If not, we'll move on until he returns. 16:48:01 jackhill will need to provide the details in a email 16:48:08 +1 16:48:18 #action jackhill provide details related to IRC issue in e-mail. 16:48:24 We can convene on IRC if necessary. 16:48:32 ideally we would have a procedure for handling such matters 16:48:51 We'll figure it out with experience. 16:49:08 #topic Getting more people involved in SC 16:49:20 There are two ways I can think off the bat here - 16:49:41 one is having a "business" channel that's open to all but kept on-topic. We do that in #ncsulug 16:50:00 i like that idea 16:50:03 The other way is to maybe make one meeting every two months or so a public "town hall" kind of deal. 16:50:10 (they aren't mutually exclusive, either) 16:50:30 i was just about to mention that we could do both 16:50:58 Letting people in on the governance might be a good way to cultivate new leaders. :) 16:51:13 agreed 16:51:34 and might also provide more people who could chip in and help with some of the administrivia 16:51:36 #trilug-business is easy and makes a great first step. 16:51:42 I agree muchly. 16:51:46 +1 16:52:10 sc members as channel ops, open to all 16:52:23 ? 16:52:28 Yeah. 16:52:34 That's what I'm thinking 16:52:42 so who here is part of #trilug-sys ? 16:52:48 not i 16:52:52 nor i 16:53:05 probably jack? 16:53:05 i think that's the sysadmin channel, yes? 16:53:42 yes, which is where we get other people to help out with sys admin tasks 16:54:27 what proportion of our membership uses IRC ? 16:54:43 so are you saying we should model trilug-business after trilug-sys? 16:54:43 we might be cutting off 80% of our members 16:54:56 we could put a link to webchat on the website. Direct line of communication with steering 16:55:21 we could have a parallel mailing list: trilug-business@ 16:55:29 I like to say we aren't cutting off 80%, we're engaging 20%. :) 16:55:32 I am saying that the low usaage and participation of #trilug-sys will also apply to #trilug-business 16:55:40 aah 16:55:43 * mhrivnak has to leave for another meeting 16:55:43 billf: fair point 16:55:46 by mhrivnak 16:56:01 it will be like the ontopic ML (which we need to disable BTW) 16:56:33 billf: We could always just pilot it for a few months and see the reception. 16:57:07 as long as at least a few of us stay somewhat active on it and answer questions 16:57:41 ontopic seemed a bit redundant, though - this would be for a specific purpose that is not necessarily something that the entire general lug population will want to participate in 16:57:51 got to go 16:57:55 bye bill 16:57:56 l8r, billf 16:57:59 thanks for your feedback 16:58:17 whippythellama: since it's just the two of us now, I think I'm going to send out a doodle for a new IRC meeting time. 16:58:24 sounds like a good idea 16:58:35 i'll catch you later. 16:58:38 #endmeeting