[TriLUG] Memory use with 2.4 kernel?
Dan Chen
crimsun at email.unc.edu
Tue Apr 2 13:58:15 EST 2002
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:08:40PM -0500, Michael Czeiszperger wrote:
> I'm sure this has been discussed on this list before, but I've recently
> upgraded my kernel at home to 2.4, and the memory usage seems to be really
> high. I've got a 256MB box, and top reports the darn thing is using most of
> it. I've turned off everything that's not in use.
Which 2.4 kernel? Virtually every revision of 2.4 gives different
performance profiles. Kinda sickening, actually. I'm at 2.4.18-rc2-ac1
myself since things appear to have stabilized.
> Call me crazy, but I kind of expect a 256MB box to be able to handle a
> vanilla workstation KDE configuration with no servers or any other extra
> software running.
It can just fine.
--
Dan Chen crimsun at email.unc.edu
GPG key: www.unc.edu/~crimsun/pubkey.gpg.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20020402/53d60dc2/attachment.pgp>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list