[TriLUG] Re: red hat sendmail rpms with tls support?

[Tanner Lovelace]

On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:10, James Manning wrote:

> The rest of this paragraph snipped.  Why?  Because Ken's comment was
> about Red Hat Linux's apache rpm.  Your reply was about sendmail, and
> as such highly irrelevant.

Good point.  While I was writing the message I saw him talking
about sendmail and then forgot to reread the last paragraph.  Mea culpa.
Sorry, Ken.
 
> And, yes, as Ken already points out, he is just a tad qualified to
> speak (rant or otherwise) on the subject of apache.  Moreso than you,
> I'd venture to guess :)

Another good point.

> If you're going to bitch to people, at least stay on subject :)

And make sure you reread the *entire* message before replying (rather
than replying after having read the message some time before).

Thanks for keeping me on topic, James. :-)

Cheers,
Tanner
P.S. For those of you who think rpms are fairly complicated and
would like to learn more about them, don't forget about the rpm
class this weekend (Sat, 11 Jan 2003, 2-4pm, RTI Dreyfus [our normal
meeting place]).
-- 
Tanner Lovelace | lovelace(at)wayfarer.org | http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
GPG Fingerprint = A66C 8660 924F 5F8C 71DA  BDD0 CE09 4F8E DE76 39D4
GPG Key can be found at http://wtl.wayfarer.org/lovelace.gpg.asc
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
"What is this talk of "release?"  We do not make software "releases."  
Our software "escapes" leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality 
assurance people in its wake." - MoncriefJM at gvl.esys.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030109/e0a18f4f/attachment.pgp>