[TriLUG] wireless bridge?
Greg Brown
gregbrown at mindspring.com
Wed Mar 26 20:43:08 EST 2003
Beam through trees: no
Beam through trees with leaves: even more no
Beam through water: no
Beam through buildings: depends
bricks: sorta
wet bricks/block/cement: nope
Beam through roofs: yeah - depending on what they are made out of
Remember - you MUST have a line of sight connection to make a reliable
point-to-point connection between two facilities using 802.11 and even
though you might have a line of sight now it could change in the
future. Establishing a real link is harder than you might think at
times. My last wireless job I had to try to find a line of sight
between a pier and a US military base in Korea. Turns out a line of
sight was impossible so I had to propose a bank shot off a hill.
Anyway, in the end neither one would work (the hill was 'owned' by
Korea Telecom) so there was no wireless connection to be had.
Greg
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Jim Ray wrote:
> I'm trying to get some NFR equipment from SMC for that purpose. They
> seem to stay out of stock. Me thinks some tuned Yagis or parabolic
> antennas with some Layer 2 hardware would make a sweet point to point
> connection with DS3 speeds and no major price tag. Life is good.
>
> Question: will they beam through obstructions like trees, roofs,
> buildings...
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jason Tower [mailto:jason at cerient.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 4:09 PM
>> To: trilug at trilug.org
>> Subject: [TriLUG] wireless bridge?
>>
>> generally speaking, can the current generation of 802.11 wireless
>> routers that sell for around $50 or sometimes even less work as an
>> ethernet bridge (in conjunction with another wireless bridge or ad-hoc
>> with a wireless nic)? i neither want nor need NAT/DHCP/firewall, all
> i
>> need is layer 2 bridging for wireless devices. i know that a few
>> manufacturers sell devices specifically designated as bridges but they
>> seem to cost twice a much as the routers despite the fact that they
>> have less functionality. has anyone tried this?
>> _______________________________________________
>> TriLUG mailing list
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ:
>> http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> TriLUG mailing list
> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
> TriLUG Organizational FAQ:
> http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list