[TriLUG] kernel question
Mike Johnson
mike at enoch.org
Tue Jul 15 09:22:27 EDT 2003
Greg Brown [gregbrown at mindspring.com] wrote:
> If I accidently included symmetric multi-processing support into my
> kernel on a machine which has only one processor. By including this
> option do I face and kind of a performance hit on my single processor
> machine? Even though I did include this option built-into my kernel I
> did not compile the kernel with options telling it to compile for N
> number of processors. I'm running the 2.4.21 kernel. If the kernel is
> fine as-is I'll just leave well enough alone until I upgrade again - if
> not, I'll recompile. Thoughts? Anyone? Bueller? Fry?
I imagine there will be a flood of responses, but just in case, the
answer is no, there is no performance hit. You'll be fine. Feel free
to leave it alone until the next upgrade.
Mike
--
"If life hands you lemons, YOU BLOW THOSE LEMONS TO BITS WITH
YOUR LASER CANNONS!" -- Brak
GNUPG Key fingerprint = ACD2 2F2F C151 FB35 B3AF C821 89C4 DF9A 5DDD 95D1
GNUPG Key = http://www.enoch.org/mike/mike.pubkey.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20030715/f6ad7d7f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list