[TriLUG] Re: sort mutt folder by spamassassin score?
James Manning
jmm at sublogic.com
Sun Dec 7 11:06:09 EST 2003
> so, I have SA send flagged stuff to a folder i try to check once every
> few days. Because SA is pretty good, I'd like to sort the folder by
> SA score so I can quickly tell the ones that "barely crept over".
Thanks to all (Jason, Jon, etc) who responded. The "right solution"
was something much more built-in to SpamAssassin than I expected:
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag Spam: _HITS_
So, I fully expected this to not work because I knew mutt would be
doing lexicographical/alphabetical sorting on the subjects - no way
it'd be doing numerical. I expected the above would give _HITS_
expanded to things like "7.6" and "13.4" and that'd fail to work
because the 13.4 would sort before the 7.6. Note that X-Spam-Status
by default would *not* have the 0 filler, ala
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.9
Lo and behold, SA once again proves it's amazing.
SA's _HITS_ expands to include a 0 fill! w00t!
From: "Leta Avila" <l.avila_md at isralift.co.il>
Subject: Spam: 07.94 get it up
now, thankfully, my SA target folder sorts perfectly on subject and is
a joy to work with.
Thanks everyone!
James
--
James Manning <http://www.sublogic.com/james/>
GPG Key fingerprint = B913 2FBD 14A9 CE18 B2B7 9C8E A0BF B026 EEBB F6E4
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list