[TriLUG] RFC: Mailing list protocol FAQ entry

[William Sutton]

The group has spoken.  After consulting with Tanner, it's staying as it 
has always been, aside from the spelling corrections Matt Frye pointed 
out.

William

On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, stan briggs wrote:

> guys,
> 
> is there really discussion about changing anything(!), even a FAQ,
> because someone got offended by jim or by jim's humor?
> 
> this is nuts. this is reactionary. this really sounds un-necessary.
> 
> the email about this proposal has generated more traffic on the list
> than the sum of all humor, good, bad, or offensive, has in total.
> 
> shouldn't we just drop it?
> 
> stan