VERPing and Personalization (was Re: [TriLUG] Iptables help)
Jon Carnes
jonc at nc.rr.com
Wed Mar 24 10:45:02 EST 2004
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 10:12, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
> Jon Carnes said the following on 3/24/04 9:36 AM:
>
> > Dear List maintainers (that's the Steering committee),
> >
> > Can we VERP the list and have this individual kicked off?
> >
> > Many thanks - Jon Carnes
>
> Hi Jon,
>
> Good idea. I *think* I've got VERP setup correctly now.
> I've set things up so each list can decide to enable
> personalization and then I set it so personalized deliveries
> are VERPed. I didn't go all the way and add "Full Personalization"
> yet, though. Can you suggest why or why not we might want to
> go that far? It looks to me like it changes who the "To:"
> field is (i.e. instead of it being the list it would be
> the person it was ultimately delivered to). Now, I would
> hope no one is filtering on To, but in the interest of not
> breaking things to much, I just went to simple personalization.
> I'm not committed to that, though, if someone can make a case
> one way or the other.
>
On the lists I monitor, I just send out a monthly verp (normally the FAQ
or password reminder). That catches a lot of the bounces that aren't
getting processed.
> As far as unsubscribing that individual, that's been done. Please
> note people that if you can't setup your e-mail to accept
> trilug messages you will be unsubscribed, no questions asked.
>
> Cheers,
> Tanner
> --
Thanks Tanner!
You just won my vote for another term on the SC. :-)
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list