VERPing and Personalization (was Re: [TriLUG] Iptables help)

Jon Carnes jonc at nc.rr.com
Wed Mar 24 10:45:02 EST 2004


On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 10:12, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
> Jon Carnes said the following on 3/24/04 9:36 AM:
> 
> > Dear List maintainers (that's the Steering committee),
> > 
> > Can we VERP the list and have this individual kicked off?
> > 
> > Many thanks - Jon Carnes
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
> Good idea.  I *think* I've got VERP setup correctly now.
> I've set things up so each list can decide to enable
> personalization and then I set it so personalized deliveries
> are VERPed.  I didn't go all the way and add "Full Personalization"
> yet, though.  Can you suggest why or why not we might want to
> go that far?  It looks to me like it changes who the "To:"
> field is (i.e. instead of it being the list it would be
> the person it was ultimately delivered to).  Now, I would
> hope no one is filtering on To, but in the interest of not
> breaking things to much, I just went to simple personalization.
> I'm not committed to that, though, if someone can make a case
> one way or the other.
> 
On the lists I monitor, I just send out a monthly verp (normally the FAQ
or password reminder).  That catches a lot of the bounces that aren't
getting processed.

> As far as unsubscribing that individual, that's been done.  Please
> note people that if you can't setup your e-mail to accept
> trilug messages you will be unsubscribed, no questions asked.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tanner
> -- 

Thanks Tanner!

You just won my vote for another term on the SC. :-)




More information about the TriLUG mailing list