[TriLUG] Mandrake business server- opinions?

Michael Hrivnak mhrivnak at triad.rr.com
Sun Jul 11 21:50:56 EDT 2004


Thanks!  That's great information.  Just for clarification, are you using 
standard Desktop releases, or are you using the Mandrake Corporate Server or 
something else?

Michael

On Sunday 11 July 2004 09:26 pm, Jason Tower wrote:
> virtually all of my clients are currently (or soon will be) running
> mandrake.  after using redhat for a couple of years, i switched to
> mandrake and have been extremely pleased with it, both as a desktop and
> a server.  it has proven to be stable, secure, and easy to manage and
> update.
>
> - excellent implementation of KDE (unlike rh/fedora - i don't care for
> gnome and i don't care for bluecurve)
>
> - standard command line tools work as they should, unlike suse (witness
> the useless useradd command, among others)
>
> - a huge collection of RPMs are available, most of them right on the
> CDs.  *WAY* more than rh/fedora deliver
>
> - a "loaded" kernel with lots of available modules (when trying to
> rescue a client's mac hard drive a few months ago, mandrake was the
> only distro that could read the HFS+ filesystem out of the box)
>
> - urpmi, though a tad difficult to get working sometimes, does a great
> job of handling updates, rpm dependencies, etc
>
> - a fast, flexible, powerful installer.  far more flexible than
> fedora's, and accomodates network installs much better than suse's
>
> i've tried almost all of the major distros out there and mandrake has
> the best pro/con ratio (debian was close though).  and this isn't just
> an academic discussion for me either, my business depends on my ability
> to install, configure, and manage linux servers.  if they fail - i
> fail.
>
> jason
>
> On Sunday 11 July 2004 20:36, Michael Hrivnak wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > In conversations here and elsewhere, it seems to me that Mandrake has
> > been labeled a good competitor for the desktop market, but I rarely
> > hear them mentioned or considered for use in business applications.
> > Since I know many of you are involved in making decisions about what
> > software a business will use, I'd like to hear opinions on Mandrake's
> > business server software.  For a refresher:
> >
> > http://www.mandrakesoft.com/businesses/
> >
> > So, what has your experience been?
> >
> > If you don't have any experience with it, why have you chosen other
> > solutions instead?
> >
> > I'm just looking for some productive discussion about the ups and
> > downs of why Mandrake does or doesn't get used in business settings.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Michael




More information about the TriLUG mailing list