[TriLUG] Slightly OT: Apache1.x Vs. Apache 2.x

[Jeremy Portzer]

On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 14:21, James Lloyd Beidler wrote:

>   However, I think that you need to examine your needs about whether or
> not to use Apache 1.x or 2.x.  If you want to just toss up a web server
> to check webmail on and not have to put a whole lot of effort into
> setting it up, use Apache 1 because most distros have Apache, PHP, and
> SM packages already available to play nice. 

That's correct, most distros do have everything set up, and they are
already running Apache 2 on most (all?) modern distros.  :-)   So
actually it's easier to use Apache 2.x today; you would have to go to an
older distro. version to get Apache 1.x.

Jeremy

-- 
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer        jeremyp at pobox.com      trilug.org/~jeremy     |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F  E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.trilug.org/pipermail/trilug/attachments/20040902/592ca062/attachment.pgp>