[TriLUG] Proposal for TriLUG List

[Kevin Sonney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Phillip Rhodes wrote:
|>this has also been discussed (again, more than once), and we decided
|>aginst it because we did want the trilug mailing list to "splinter".
|
| Was this a Steering Committe discussion or a main mailing list
discussion or
| something discussed at a meeting? I ask only because I don't recall the
| discussion...

If I may break out my old-man syndrome, the idea of splitting the lists
has come up multiple times over the years trilug has been in existence.
After careful consideration, we shot it down when I was chair because of
the effect it had on other groups - effectively splintering the groups,
the discussions, and the effectiveness of the group.

In the end, we did try it for a while, and in the mailing lists created
for the subcommittees/interests withered and died in favor of the main
list.

For TriLUG, one list and good etiquette   seems to work. And I agree
that if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

- --
- ----------------------------------
- --         Kevin Sonney         --
- --  ICQ: 4855069  AIM: ksonney  --
- ----------------------------------
1024D/320C 0336 3BC4 13EC 4AEC  6AF2 525F CED7 7BB6 12C9
~ Whip me.  Beat me.  Make me maintain AIX. -- Stephan Zielinski
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFDOf69ce1jAa4B7VERAvlFAJinusij3C5jLj46yU+8gaAuOMzHAJ91kCzV
CVRJp33ukkgaR3VYZl8LXg==
=531m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----