[TriLUG] Ultra 320 SCSI card recommendations
Kevin Flanagan
kevin at flanagannc.net
Thu Dec 29 20:56:52 EST 2005
I second Jason's comment, it's more likely that with a non RAID card,
you will find the spinning spindles to be the bottleneck much more often
than the channel to them.
If you are have a configuration where the spindles aren't the
bottleneck, you shouldn't scrimp on a cheap card, get an Adaptec at the
very least. If you have an application where the SCSI bus is the
bottleneck shouldn't you be looking at a caching array controller?
Just my thoughts,
Kevin
Jason Tower wrote:
> i have a few cards, but i think they're u160 not u320. i doubt you'll
> noting any significant performance between the two, the disk will be
> the bottleneck not the scsi speed.
>
> Tarus Balog wrote:
>> Gang:
>>
>> I'm looking for a Linux-friendly (CentOS 4) SCSI card that supports
>> U320. Nothing fancy (i.e. RAID) and the less expensive the better.
>>
>> -T
>> -----
>>
>> Tarus Balog
>> The OpenNMS Group, Inc.
>> Main : +1 919 545 2553 Fax: +1 503-961-7746
>> Direct: +1 919 647 4749 Skype: tarusb
>> Key Fingerprint: 8945 8521 9771 FEC9 5481 512B FECA 11D2 FD82 B45C
>>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list