[TriLUG] OT: OpenVote

[Andrew Perrin]

I'm having trouble resisting the urge to respond here.... so I won't 
resist anymore :)

1.) The "electronic town hall" idea is not new, as appealing as it is on 
its face. Ross Perot championed it in 1992, pretty much directly 
channeling the arguments of the Progressive movement of the turn of the 
(20th) century. The ballot propositions and recall provisions in many 
western states' constitutions -- emphatically including California -- are 
essentially holdovers from that movement. Note that not only has the 
ballot proposition failed to increase popular involvement in California 
politics, it's done the opposite: increase the influence of well-funded, 
well-organized interests (usually big business, but every once in a while 
labor) that are unchecked by the normal electoral process.  From the 
standpoint of democratic theory, the initiative/referendum process is a 
dismal failure.

2.) While I would wholeheartedly support the idea of an OpenVote system, I 
do think the problem to be addressed is at least as much social as it is 
technical. Voting technologies were widely disparate and poorly controlled 
for decades without any public outcry; then, after the 2000 election in 
Florida, they suddenly became a major public issue. The problem of trust 
between machines can be solved technologically; the problem of trust 
between humans can be facilitated technologically, but requires social 
intervention as well.

3.) The Freakonomics guys are right about the unintended consequences of 
changes in voting technologies. Reducing the "cost" of voting may also 
reduce the "value" of it, as they suggest, thereby potentially reducing 
voting rates. Furthermore, the constitution contemplates voting day as 
essentially a single moment in time -- it's supposed to be a "snapshot" of 
the public sentiment at that time. Many simplification technologies serve 
also to extend the time allowed to vote up to a month in some cases. What 
happens if important events, campaign outcomes, etc., happen during that 
month? Think of the several "october surprises" that have happened 
during presidential campaigns. What's the "correct" measure of the public 
sentiment?

4.) Finally, then I'll shut up and wait for the off-topic flames: at least 
one strain of constitutional thought contemplates democratic engagement as 
essentially conversational -- think of the New England town meeting as an 
example, where disagreeing citizens are forced to air their disagreements 
in dialogue with one another. Granted, this is far from what happens now. 
But technologies and practices that further isolate citizens as they 
choose and vote are probably ultimately bad for democratic practice.

Cheerio,
Andy

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology; Book Review Editor, _Social Forces_
University of North Carolina - CB#3210, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210 USA
New Book: http://www.press.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/hfs.cgi/00/178592.ctl