[TriLUG] Site to Site VPN over the net? Good enough for VoIP?
Ron Joffe
rjoffe at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 31 09:33:34 EST 2006
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 08:54, Chad Thomsen wrote:
> Was wondering if anybody is doing this successfully at there BUSINESS (not
> looking at home usage). I have a 7 site network and was thinking about
> converting from ITC Deltacom frame to speakeasy.net DSL (since they offer a
> CIR like service) but was wondering if very many folks have been successful
> with it. BIG question is performance. What happens if the traffic on the
> internet backbone is really heavy? Would it not effect the performance of
> the VoIP? Speakeasy.net can gaurantee minimum bandwidth to and form the
> "intenet cloud" from each location but once traffic is traveling accross
> that cloud you are at the mercy of the internet backbone.
>
Chad,
We have three offices set up in Oregon and North Carolina. These are one man
home offices for a small consulting firm. We have been successfully using
VOIP for 5+ years. One office is RR Commercial, one is RR Residential, and
the third is DSL.
We have had a number of different solutions over the years. Point to Point
SIP, Asterisk with server at one location, and remote SIP clients registering
to that Asterisk Server, Asterisk - Asterisk server communications.
In addition we all have VOIP - PSTN gateways (Vonage, FWD, etc). There are
VPN's point to point using dedicated VPN Gateways between the offices.
I would have to say that the overall quality of VOIP internally (office to
office over VPN) has been of a better quality then the VOIP-PSTN (Vonage,
etc).
That is our experience with a set of small (one man) offices.
Ron
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list