[TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel

Jim Ray jim at neuse.net
Tue Aug 1 17:38:07 EDT 2006


yes, really.  not that anyone cares to discuss winders in this group; 
however, symantec antivirus corporate edition as well as winder's own 
WSUS puke hard with 64 bit Windows 2003 Server.

from a server point of view, that's a show stopper and very specific. 
WinXP64 is not a server OS.  i'll defer judgement on 64 bit desktops to 
others since the majority of my customers have 32 bit hardware and don't 
care.

all the best for a happy and safe move to NY just the same, though.

Regards,

Jim

Jim Ray, President
Neuse River Networks
2610 Vanderbilt Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27607-7247

tel: 919-838-1672
cell: 919-606-1772
http://www.Neuse.Net

Connecting You to the World since 1997

Matthew Lavigne wrote:
> Really?  I have only seen that basically anything that runs as a service 
> looks
> for 64 bit and then dies (namely Antivirus).  In my old shop (yes, it is 
> not
> mine anymore) we installed and ran everything as 32 bit with the 
> exception of
> antivirus.  In the course of 24 months we have never had a conflict 
> where an
> application acted badly other then trying to install again a 32 bit 
> antivirus
> on WinXP64.
> 
> A little more qualification would be nice rather then generalizations,
> especially if you have some known bad applications.
> 
> Personally I have found very little that would force me to 64 bit 
> Windows though
> the workstation that I have (along with the 6GB of system memory) would 
> drive me
> to.  It is not difficult to use the /PAE switch or several others to 
> push the
> memory limits around (especially if you have Xeon CPUs).
> 
> This box isn't linux yet cause there is too much that I need to convert 
> to a
> vmware image before I move it over...
> 
> Matthew Lavigne
> Preparing to move to NY....
> 
> 
> 
> Quoting Jim Ray <jim at neuse.net>:
> 
>> Winders has 64 bit versions.  I don't use them because too many apps are
>> broken.
>>
>> Jim Ray, President
>> Neuse River Networks
>>
>> tel: 919-838-1672
>> http://www.Neuse.Net
>>
>> Connecting You to the World since 1997
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org
>>> [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On Behalf Of Greg Brown
>>> Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 11:10 AM
>>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group discussion list
>>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] AMD vs. Intel
>>>
>>> You bring up an interesting point.  My neighbor just
>>> purchased a new laptop
>>> that has a 64 bit processor.   Can XPee Home even take
>>> advantage of a 64 bit
>>> processor?
>>>
>>> She's already fed up with the anti-virus she is using and has
>>> already asked about Linux (after hearing me yap about it for
>>> years now).  Hopefully she'll pull the trigger and I can
>>> intall Ubuntu as a social expirement.  I'd really like to see
>>> how well a seriously non-techincal person manages with Ubuntu.
>>>
>>> On 7/28/06, Kevin Flanagan <kevin at flanagannc.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > That would have to fall in the "that depends" category.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > What would you be doing with the system, for a laptop, I
>>> see that HP
>>> > now has a Turion 64Bit laptop, interesting if you could
>>> take advantage
>>> > of the processor.
>>> >
>>> > If you are using much CPU to Memory transfer intensive
>>> applications,
>>> > then AMD has the edge, otherwise I don't think that it
>>> matters as much.
>>> >
>>> > What about the other stuff, that says more in many cases.
>>> >
>>> > What disks are available, SATA, or PATA, or SCSI?
>>> > What Video subsystem suits your needs best?
>>> > How much RAM can you get for the system in question?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > As usual, there's a lot more to the "best" answer,
>>> generally I think
>>> > that if you get a top tier system now it's likely enough for 95% or
>>> > more of folks, unless you're just that kind of geek who
>>> needs to spec
>>> > out every last detail.
>>> >
>>> > Then there's cost.....
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Kevin
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Greg Brown wrote:
>>> > > It was not long ago at all, just last year, that the prevailing
>>> > > opinion of those on Trilug seemed to be that AMD was
>>> leading the way
>>> > > for chip
>>> > design
>>> > > for the foreseeable future.  With Intel's latest announcements,
>>> > > along with the Core Duo, I was wondering what the
>>> consensus opinion
>>> > > was these days.
>>> > >
>>> > > If you were going to build a linux desktop or laptop what
>>> processor
>>> > would
>>> > > you pick?  Intel, AMD, or something else?
>>> > >
>>> > > 3.... 2..... 1..... FIGHT!!
>>> > --
>>> > TriLUG mailing list        :
>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>> > TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member
>>> > Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>>> >
>>> -- 
>>> TriLUG mailing list        :
>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG
>>> Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>>
>> -- 
>> TriLUG mailing list        : 
>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
>> TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
>>
> 
> 
> 



More information about the TriLUG mailing list