[TriLUG] Spamassassin+Postfix on a per-domain basis?

[Tanner Lovelace]

On 12/1/06, Jason Tower <jason at cerient.net> wrote:
> SA will probably process them to some extent but if they're whitelisted
> they'll pass thru with minimal overhead.  i don't recall if the headers of
> whitelisted messages are modified or not, if so then disk i/o could be a
> bottleneck.  but you could always make a small ramdisk just for spamd to use
> for its cache and temp files.

You can tell SA not to process headers if you don't want it to.  I've
seen setups where SA never touches the headers unless it goes above
the defined threshold.

Cheers,
Tanner
-- 
Tanner Lovelace
clubjuggler at gmail dot com
http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
(fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an
increscent, all sable.