[TriLUG] Steering@ (was: [OT] At what ratio do OT post become on topic?)

[Cristóbal Palmer]

I don't object to having a steering@ email. I do object to having 15
or so additional emails that I have to manually confirm as spam daily.
Because of the nature of a steering@ list, the bayes threshold has to
be pretty high for it to be a valid contact method, which wouldn't be
an issue in a spam-free world...

We'll come up with solution that works for people. Please stand by.

If you have brilliant suggestions for how we can have a point of
contact that is accessible to people with disabilities, people who
prefer email, people who hate spam, etc, please do contact me directly
or fill out the form here:

http://trilug.org/contact

Thanks,
CMP

On 5/23/07, Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime at cpphacker.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm just one vote on the SC, so no promises... but I'd argue for
> restoring steering@
> as well.  It's what people know and are used too, and it just plain
> feels unnatural to me to
> need to go fill out a form on a webpage in order to send a message.  But
> that's just me...

-- 
Cristóbal M. Palmer
administrator!!! please hope me!