[TriLUG] One Laptop Per Child
Jeremy Portzer
jeremyp at pobox.com
Mon Nov 19 02:53:55 EST 2007
Shawn Hood wrote:
> -Teaching people how to create vaccines instead of providing them at great
> expense.
> -The spread of information about government, including democracy.
> -Effective dialog concering birth control among people of all faiths
>
What exactly do you mean by "Teaching people how to create vaccines
instead of providing them at great expense." That seems pretty scary.
At least a recipient of an OLPC might be able to get sensible healthcare
information and realize that unproven home remedies are NOT as effective
as those produced by quality pharmaceutical companies (which expend
billions every year providing drugs at lower-than-cost prices to
developing nations). But never mind.
I think the OLPC project is pretty neat, but I have failed to understand
how this is a good use of money compared to charities providing more
basic needs for children, such as UNICEF. You can't have an information
economy - what the OLPC is purporting to be a catalyst for - without
having basic infrastructure first, such as clean water, safe sewers,
electricity (how else to run your laptop), equitable land policy, and
most importantly, safe, affordable housing. For example, what good
does information on sustainable farming do for you if you're a squatter
without land in El Salvador, where historically 12 families held 95% of
the country's land? Or if you've got no electricity, phones, or other
practical way to receive this "information" that the OLPC purports to
provide?
I also feel the OLPC project needs to smart smaller, with a pilot
project in a few areas - perhaps those that AREN'T the poorest of them
all, and thus would be more likely to succeed. (Heck, you could
probably use a project like this in some places in the USA such as
Appalachia, inner city neighborhoods, etc. - at least they have
electricity and reasonable chance of Internet access.)
The OLPC costs $200. Here are a few other things that $200 could buy
you, according to UNICEF:
* 26 mosquito nets, which would actually help PREVENT malaria instead of
just learning about it
* 434 doses of a measles vaccine (is that really THAT expensive, Shawn?)
* Five bicycles to allow health-care workers to reach remote villages
* Over 500 liters of therapeutic milk for severely malnourished children
Or there's organizations like Habitat for Humanity, which can build
homes (for families of 4-6 people) for under $1000 in certain areas.
--Jeremy, thinking maybe this discussion belongs in another group. What
ever happened to the trilug-ot or trilug-chat mailing list proposals?
sources for costs above:
http://inspiredgifts.unicefusa.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ig_cat_immunization
http://inspiredgifts.unicefusa.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ig_cat_nutrition
P.S. On the other hand, if this is bringing some people into awareness
of global poverty who otherwise wouldn't be interested in helping, I
guess I could grudgingly see some usefulness. But I still think the
project has too many fundamental flaws. -J.P.
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list