[TriLUG] Zoom - conferencing
Roger W. Broseus via TriLUG
trilug at trilug.org
Fri Apr 24 16:22:23 EDT 2020
A few weeks ago I read the Zoom claimed to have end-to-end encryption but not
true. And, they were scanning content as it passes thru their servers, passing
on info to advertisers. I would not use Zoom for anything that I would not
want to fall into the hands of unscrupulous malefactors. If you had
hemorrhoids, would you want someone listening in to know about it to see
Preparation H to you? It could be worse.
I do agree that it appears that some measures have apparently been added to
make it possible to protect a session - that is if the master of ceremonies is
savvy enough to implement them.
--
Roger W. Broseus - Linux User
Email: RogerB at bronord.com
Web Site: www.bronord.com
On 4/24/20 3:29 PM, Michael Rulison via TriLUG wrote:
> Dear TriLUGers,
>
> I will stick my neck out and let you correct my understandings:
>
> Zoom insecurity and privacy issues has been overblown, IMO.
>
> Yes, some sessions were hacked into (AFAIK, using emails garnered/stolen
> outside of Zoom).
> Some of those sessions involved school kids and perhaps 'inappropriate'
> visual and audio content; that was not nice or kind, but that is the world
> we live in. Protections from crazies ARE needed.
>
> So, AFAIK Zoom allows
>
> * meeting invitations to persons I select
> o along with a password specific to that meeting
> * a 'waiting room' from which the host may admit to the conference
> only those persons recognized as properly invited persons.
> * the host may mute all persons accepted into the meeting
> * the host may unmute/mute only those he/she chooses.
> * the host may enable/disable screen sharing for him/her self and any
> participant
>
> To me this seems to give adequate security for most meetings/conferences.
> What have I missed?
>
> I have been in a score of Zoom meetings in the past several weeks, using
> Firefox as my browser. There have been frequent problems of participants
> unable to unmute themselves, or use their webcam, or share their screen, but
> these have been lack of knowledge, not software problems.
>
> Some meetings have been from my free account with a limit of 40 minutes a
> session, which Zoom has often graciously not enforced.
>
> I find it very satisfactory, though I want to check Discord and BigBlueButton.
>
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list