[TriLUG] Kernel compilation class

[Jon Carnes]

How about the specialty role of the Samba server?

At my former job the primary Samba server was used continuously by 200+
folks using a stock Red Hat Kernel.  I kept throwing other services on it,
and it never missed a beat.  The server was running a VALinux modified
RedHat 6.2 install. Whatever tweaks VALinux did kept the server up and
running much better than the default Red Hat kernel release of 6.2.

Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Ray" <jim at neuse.net>
To: <trilug at trilug.org>
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:08 AM
Subject: RE: [TriLUG] Kernel compilation class


Actually, our goals are one in the same.  By compiling kernels to run
the minimum necessary services and by distributing http, smtp, ftp,
file/print services onto separate computers, one minimizes the
probability for catastrophic system failure in a corporate environment.

We could always throw in a little kickstart and g4u into the mix...


-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Carnes [mailto:jonc at nc.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 11:45 AM
To: trilug at trilug.org
Subject: RE: [TriLUG] Kernel compilation class

On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 11:15, Jim Ray wrote:
> Compiling kernel to minimize footprint 101
>
I would rather like to see how to optimize the kernel for a corporate
environment.  As an example that recently crossed the list: how to
configure it for maximum stability in an environment with a massive
number of simultaneous connections.



_______________________________________________
TriLUG mailing list
    http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ:
    http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html
_______________________________________________
TriLUG mailing list
    http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ:
    http://www.trilug.org/~lovelace/faq/TriLUG-faq.html