[TriLUG] VoIP for 125 users
Ryan Leathers
rleathers at americanri.com
Tue Oct 26 10:21:19 EDT 2010
I'll add to Jon's comments - he has at least one former customer who
spent the big dollars on Avaya and now can't wait to switch back to
FeatureTel
On 10/25/2010 6:52 PM, jonc at nc.rr.com wrote:
> Avaya would probably be the most expensive route you could go. When he says that everything is licensed based he's not kidding - and those licenses aren't cheap.
>
> Almost any other main brand will provide more functionality at a lower cost. We have some former Avaya clients who are very happy to be "former" :-)
>
> Jon Carnes
> FeatureTel.com
>
> ---- Jim Ray<jim at neuse.net> wrote:
>> One of our customers is the 5th largest accounting firm in the US and uses Avaya.
>>
>> Here's their local rep if you want to go that route:
>>
>> http://www.tricom-teleco.com
>>
>> We did not pick up that product line due to $10k expense for demo system/training. We picked up 3cx.com and like being able to scale hardware according to needs based on well-known PC/server architecture as opposed to proprietary hardware.
>>
>> I know some folks that use http://www.shoretel.com/ yet thought they were a bit over the top price wise.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jim Ray, President
>> Neuse River Networks tel: 919-838-1672 cell: 919-606-1772 skype: neusedotnet
>>
>> The ONE(tm) Plan from Neuse River Networks
>> Put maintenance behind the scenes, after-hours and out of your way.
>>
>> http://www.NeuseRiverNetworks.com/oneplan
>>
>> Web: http://www.neuserivernetworks.com Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/neuse Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/neuseriver Twitter: http://twitter.com/neuse
>>
>> Customer Service/Support: Send email to support at neuserivernetworks.com or visit http://www.neuserivernetworks.com/support
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: trilug-bounces at trilug.org [mailto:trilug-bounces at trilug.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bullock
>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:41 PM
>> To: Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion
>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] VoIP for 125 users
>>
>> I know this is late in the game but we have an Avaya system and are really pleased with it. Not sure what your plans are but we have 4 remote offices connecting via IP to our main facility, each site is independent but uses some resources from the home site(long distance plans, centralized voicemail, hotdesking.) We have a mix of digital and IP sets. I was running a VPN at home and had an IP set at home and could work fine from that. The huntgroups are very configurable and work really well. Avaya coupled with their voicemail/autoattendant product adds much configure ability, ie DB access, mail, and analog controls, ie unlock a door by call a particular line or extension. Avaya has the ability to handle analog devices also, this alone has saved us thousands of dollars on B1 lines every year.
>> I will say that their new pricing model is much more expensive than it used to be. Everything now is licensed based.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> --- On Fri, 10/15/10, David M.<turnpike420 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: David M.<turnpike420 at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [TriLUG] VoIP for 125 users
>>> To: "Triangle Linux Users Group General Discussion"<trilug at trilug.org>
>>> Date: Friday, October 15, 2010, 10:55 AM
>>> Matt, that's an amazing amount of
>>> info. You've clearly got your head
>>> wrapped around this stuff. Roll our own is a
>>> possibility, but I do think we
>>> are likely to go with a vendor ... if something goes wrong,
>>> it's their fault
>>> not mine. :)
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Matt Pusateri
>>> <mpusateri at wickedtrails.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> You can look at sipXecs, which was backed by nortel,
>>> and sold by nortel.
>>>> Avaya has picked up the remnants, and will
>>> be releasing a product on it.
>>>> I was really not impressed with Avaya or there
>>> local people when I had to
>>>> deal with them at a previous job. Most of the
>>> commercial systems I looked
>>>> at are old pbx/key systems and voip is just an bolt on
>>> and really do not
>>>> seem to be done well. SipXecs (http://www.sipfoundry.org) has forked
>>>> from the Avaya build and there is a company Euze, that
>>> is sponsoring it and
>>>> doing development work. You can get commercial
>>> support from them, so it's
>>>> not like you're just downloading asterisk/trixbox
>>> etc. Of course you can
>>>> get commercial support for Asterisk and Trixbox as
>>> well. I run Trixbox at my
>>>> current job, and there things I like and things I
>>> dislike about it. The
>>>> more I use Trixbox, the less I like it
>>> specifically. Trixbox is Asterisk
>>>> plus FreePBX 2 with Trixbox addons hacked on
>>> top. FreePBX 3 has forked and
>>>> is under a new name
>>>> . This kinda makes Trixbox less appealing
>>> in the long run. What I
>>>> really like about sipx/sipfoundry is that they are
>>> really implementing sip
>>>> correctly or appear to be. This
>>> allows them to use proxy's and SBC's and
>>>> not make a B2BUA like asterisk do the wrong type of
>>> work. The sipfoundry
>>>> architecture is just a much better design. You
>>> can't even set the product
>>>> up without doing DNS correctly for sip uri
>>> dialing. Plus they have basic
>>>> clustering/ldap/ and jabber support out of the
>>> box. I have a test box right
>>>> now, and hope to eventually replace trixbox/asterisk
>>> at work with it.
>>>> If you are going to roll you own or use a FOSS
>>> solution (Again commercial
>>>> support is available and may get you past the PHB's) I
>>> would recommend
>>>> Polycom phones over Cisco's or Snoms or
>>> Astara's. Polycom seems to be
>>>> trying hard to make a SIP compliant phone.
>>>>
>>>> If you need more help or have questions feel free to
>>> ping me off list.
>>>>
>>>> Matt P.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was sent to: Chris Bullock<cgbullock at yahoo.com>
>>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org
>>> from that address.
>>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web :
>>> http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/cgbullock%40yahoo.com
>>> TriLUG FAQ : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent to: Jim Ray<jim at neuse.net>
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from that address.
>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/jim%40neuse.net
>> TriLUG FAQ : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
>> --
>> This message was sent to: Jon Carnes - cybertooth<jonc at nc.rr.com>
>> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to trilug-leave at trilug.org from that address.
>> TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
>> Unsubscribe or edit options on the web : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/options/trilug/jonc%40nc.rr.com
>> TriLUG FAQ : http://www.trilug.org/wiki/Frequently_Asked_Questions
More information about the TriLUG
mailing list